|
rainbow bottledsand- bottledsand- bottledsand- bottledsand- meteora looking forward to TAIWAN trip sunshine public holidays money drop from up above exercise schedule bees roses amanda april aqidah baldwin benson boon heng clement sim desmond quek eden eileen aw georgina ooi hariani huizhen jaclyn jasmine jerome joanna mai jocelin tan jolene tan jonathan tan joyce jing ting kareen kenny tan khairul le ying lihong louisa tan marlina mark toh matthew meijuan melissa leong ms chuah mu en qing hui randy raphael razanah shuyi/suming/weishan stefenie wang min wei jie yile yong woei zhi mei zhuo jie daisies > October 2004 > November 2004 > December 2004 > January 2005 > February 2005 > March 2005 > April 2005 > May 2005 > June 2005 > July 2005 > August 2005 > September 2005 > October 2005 > November 2005 > December 2005 > January 2006 > February 2006 > March 2006 > April 2006 > May 2006 > June 2006 > July 2006 > August 2006 > September 2006 > October 2006 > November 2006 > December 2006 > January 2007 > February 2007 > March 2007 > April 2007 > May 2007 > June 2007 > July 2007 > August 2007 > September 2007 > October 2007 > November 2007 > December 2007 > January 2008 > February 2008 > March 2008 > April 2008 > May 2008 > June 2008 > July 2008 > August 2008 > September 2008 > October 2008 > November 2008 > December 2008 > January 2009 > February 2009 > March 2009 > April 2009 > May 2009 > July 2009 > November 2009 > June 2010 credits skin by: Jane |
diplomacy, democracy, meritocracy
20.1.07 @ 21:04 diplomacy: The art of dealing with people in a sensitive and effective way. democracy: the practice or principles of social equality. meritocracy: government or the holding of power by people selected on the basis of their ability. take a look at the definitions and tell me, which of those is(are) missing. i will say all three. there's no diplomacy, not everyone is treated the same way, even if they're not in the wrong. there's no democracy, no one's listening to the people. they heard, but they did not listen. there's no meritocracy what-so-ever. maybe i'm saying this too early, but from what i know, there is no such thing as meritocracy as people who work their butts off get nothing in return. yes, you may say that the world is not fair. but how can it be so unfair that people who deserve to be rewarded might not be. if they were told, they'll say they've heard the people and have done changes. ya right. the keyword here is heard. they HAVE heard, they did not LISTEN. its the same as they looked, but they don't see. if the changes are done, why are there so many people who have not so positive feelings towards them? why do the people still feel the way they felt? i'm sure they've heard the people, they're so low-context that they can't understand what really is going on. they're so low-context i really don't know how to help them even if i wanted to. they've merely resolved the problems on the surface. its like stitching up your wound without taking out the bullet when the bullet fragments are in the vital organs. the person will die, for goodness sake. i can fully understand why the people are feeling this way. at first i believed in them that they will be good, but looks like i was wrong. let me ask you, how many people have cried because of them? how many people have felt like leaving? how many people are actually supportive of them? but this is really a bad experience for me. why can't they be close to the people? why can't they do things right? why can't they change for the better? why? why on earth am i so crushed by such things? just say i'm foolish or i'm too naive for this. because obviously the past has been peaceful for me. please just let all this people understand what the people are trying to tell them. please just let all this nonsense go away. please...let there be diplomacy, democracy and meritocracy.... with love, xoxo |